↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of factors associated with noncompliance in users of combined hormonal contraceptive methods: a cross-sectional study: results from the MIA study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Women's Health, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of factors associated with noncompliance in users of combined hormonal contraceptive methods: a cross-sectional study: results from the MIA study
Published in
BMC Women's Health, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6874-13-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Txantón Martínez-Astorquiza-Ortiz de Zarate, Teresa Díaz-Martín, Txantón Martínez-Astorquiza-Corral

Abstract

Understanding contraception from the perspective of the user may help to improve compliance. The aim of this project was to determine the factors that influence the noncompliance in young women that use combined hormonal contraceptives (pill, patch or vaginal ring).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 21 24%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2013.
All research outputs
#14,180,180
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#1,083
of 1,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,890
of 211,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.