You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relationship between efficiency and clinical effectiveness indicators in an adjusted model of resource consumption: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-421 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Concepción Violán, Oleguer Plana-Ripoll, Quintí Foguet-Boreu, Bonaventura Bolíbar, Alba Aguado, Ruth Navarro-Artieda, Soledad Velasco-Velasco, Antoni Sicras-Mainar, the ACG® Study Group |
| Abstract |
Adjusted clinical groups (ACG®) have been widely used to adjust resource distribution; however, the relationship with effectiveness has been questioned. The purpose of the study was to measure the relationship between efficiency assessed by ACG® and a clinical effectiveness indicator in adults attended in Primary Health Care Centres (PHCs). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 43 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 24% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2013.
All research outputs
#14,764,029
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,345
of 7,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,867
of 211,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#97
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.