The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Carbon nanotube dosimetry: from workplace exposure assessment to inhalation toxicology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-8977-10-53 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aaron Erdely, Matthew Dahm, Bean T Chen, Patti C Zeidler-Erdely, Joseph E Fernback, M Eileen Birch, Douglas E Evans, Michael L Kashon, James A Deddens, Tracy Hulderman, Suzan A Bilgesu, Lori Battelli, Diane Schwegler-Berry, Howard D Leonard, Walter McKinney, David G Frazer, James M Antonini, Dale W Porter, Vincent Castranova, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan |
| Abstract |
Dosimetry for toxicology studies involving carbon nanotubes (CNT) is challenging because of a lack of detailed occupational exposure assessments. Therefore, exposure assessment findings, measuring the mass concentration of elemental carbon from personal breathing zone (PBZ) samples, from 8 U.S.-based multi-walled CNT (MWCNT) manufacturers and users were extrapolated to results of an inhalation study in mice. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 22% |
| Researcher | 17 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 15% |
| Engineering | 9 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 27% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,553,582
of 26,368,346 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#51
of 631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,669
of 226,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,368,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them