You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of methods for measuring and assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in terrestrial carbon pools. How do the accuracy and precision of current methods compare? A systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6 |
| Authors |
Gillian Petrokofsky, Hideki Kanamaru, Frédéric Achard, Scott J Goetz, Hans Joosten, Peter Holmgren, Aleksi Lehtonen, Mary CS Menton, Andrew S Pullin, Martin Wattenbach |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 490 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 472 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 85 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 17% |
| Researcher | 80 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 79 | 16% |
| Unknown | 102 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 160 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 132 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 36 | 7% |
| Engineering | 11 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 5% |
| Unknown | 120 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,675,509
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#109
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,433
of 179,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them