↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of personalized self-management support using the self-management screening questionnaire SeMaS; a study protocol for a cluster randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementation of personalized self-management support using the self-management screening questionnaire SeMaS; a study protocol for a cluster randomized trial
Published in
Trials, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-336
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathalie Eikelenboom, Jan van Lieshout, Michel Wensing, Ivo Smeele, Annelies E Jacobs

Abstract

The number of patients with one or more chronic diseases is rising. In several standards of care there is a focus on enhancing self-management. We applied the concept of personalization on self-management support and developed a self-management screening questionnaire (SeMaS). The main research objective is to assess the effectiveness of the SeMaS questionnaire and subsequent personalized self-management on patients' self-management behaviors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 137 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 32 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 14%
Psychology 13 9%
Computer Science 7 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 37 26%