↓ Skip to main content

Maternal adverse effects of different antenatal magnesium sulphate regimens for improving maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal adverse effects of different antenatal magnesium sulphate regimens for improving maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-195
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily S Bain, Philippa F Middleton, Caroline A Crowther

Abstract

Antenatal magnesium sulphate, widely used in obstetrics to improve maternal and infant outcomes, may be associated with adverse effects for the mother sufficient for treatment cessation. This systematic review aimed to quantify maternal adverse effects attributed to treatment, assess how adverse effects vary according to different regimens, and explore women's experiences with this treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 183 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Researcher 12 6%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 54 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 11%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 56 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2013.
All research outputs
#13,899,800
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,608
of 4,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,186
of 211,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#36
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.