↓ Skip to main content

Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for offenders: protocol for a pragmatic randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for offenders: protocol for a pragmatic randomized trial
Published in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1940-0640-8-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael L Prendergast, Jerome J Cartier

Abstract

Although screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) is an evidence-based technique that, in some health-care settings, has been shown to cost-effectively reduce alcohol and drug use, research on the efficacy of SBIRT among criminal offender populations is limited. Such populations have a high prevalence of drug and alcohol use but limited access to intervention, and many are at risk for post-release relapse and recidivism. Thus, there exists a need for treatment options for drug-involved offenders of varying risk levels to reduce risky behaviors or enter treatment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 26%
Student > Master 14 19%
Other 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 21%
Social Sciences 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 16 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,080,479
of 5,036,908 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#56
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,670
of 107,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,036,908 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 57th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.