↓ Skip to main content

Thiazolidinedione use and atrial fibrillation in diabetic patients: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thiazolidinedione use and atrial fibrillation in diabetic patients: a meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12872-017-0531-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiwei Zhang, Xiaowei Zhang, Panagiotis Korantzopoulos, Konstantinos P. Letsas, Gary Tse, Mengqi Gong, Lei Meng, Guangping Li, Tong Liu

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that thiazolidinediones (TZDs) may exert protective effects in atrial fibrillation (AF). The present meta-analysis investigated the association between TZD use and the incidence of AF in diabetic patients. Electronic databases were searched until December 2016. Of the 346 initially identified records, 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 4 observational studies with 130,854 diabetic patients were included in the final analysis. Pooled analysis of the included studies demonstrated that patients treated with TZDs had approximately 30% lower risk of developing AF compared to controls [odds ratio (OR): 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62 to 0.87, p = 0.0003]. This association was consistently observed for both new onset AF (OR =0.77, p = 0.002) and recurrent AF (OR =0.41, p = 0.002), pioglitazone use (OR =0.56, p = 0.04) but not rosiglitazone use (OR =0.78, p = 0.12). The association between TZD use and AF incidence was not significant in the pooled analysis of three RCTs (OR =0.77, 95% CI = 0.53-1.12, p = 0.17), but was significantly in the pooled analysis of the four observational studies (OR =0.71, p = 0.0003). This meta-analysis suggests that TZDs may confer protection against AF in the setting of diabetes mellitus (DM). This class of drugs can be used as upstream therapy for DM patients to prevent the development of AF. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to determine whether TZDs use could prevent AF in the setting of DM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Master 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 48%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2017.
All research outputs
#17,885,520
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#1,067
of 1,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,951
of 309,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#22
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.