↓ Skip to main content

Does capitation affect the delivery of oral healthcare and access to services? Evidence from a pilot contact in Northern Ireland

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does capitation affect the delivery of oral healthcare and access to services? Evidence from a pilot contact in Northern Ireland
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12913-017-2117-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harry Hill, Stephen Birch, Martin Tickle, Ruth McDonald, Michael Donaldson, Donncha O’Carolan, Paul Brocklehurst

Abstract

In May 2009, the Northern Ireland government introduced General Dental Services (GDS) contracts based on capitation in dental practices newly set up by a corporate dental provider to promote access to dental care in populations that had previously struggled to secure service provision. Dental service provision forms an important component of general health services for the population, but the implications of health system financing on care delivered and the financial cost of services has received relatively little attention in the research literature. The aim of this study is to evaluate the policy effect capitation payment in recently started corporate practices had on the delivery of primary oral healthcare in Northern Ireland and access to services. We analysed the policy initiative in Northern Ireland as a natural experiment to find the impact on healthcare delivery of the newly set up corporate practices that use a prospective capitation system to remunerate primary care dentists. Data was collected from GDS claim forms submitted to the Business Services Organisation (BSO) between April 2011 and October 2014. Health and Social Care Board (HSCB) practices operating within a capitation system were matched to a control group, who were remunerated using a retrospective fee-for-service system. No evidence of patient selection was found in the HSCB practices set up by a corporate provider and operated under capitation. However, patients were less likely to visit the dentist and received less treatment when they did attend, compared to those belonging to the control group (P < 0.05). The extent of preventive activity offered and the patient payment charge revenue did not differ between the two practice groups. Although remunerating NHS primary care dentists in newly set up corporate practices using a prospective capitation system managed costs within healthcare, there is evidence that this policy may have reduced access to care of registered patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 26%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 21 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 23 31%