Title |
Efficacy of adding the kinesio taping method to guideline-endorsed conventional physiotherapy in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-301 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marco Aurélio Nemitalla Added, Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa, Thiago Yukio Fukuda, Diego Galace de Freitas, Evelyn Cassia Salomão, Renan Lima Monteiro, Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa |
Abstract |
Chronic nonspecific low back pain is a significant health condition with high prevalence worldwide and it is associated with enormous costs to society. Clinical practice guidelines show that many interventions are available to treat patients with chronic low back pain, but the vast majority of these interventions have a modest effect in reducing pain and disability. An intervention that has been widespread in recent years is the use of elastic bandages called Kinesio Taping. Although Kinesio Taping has been used extensively in clinical practice, current evidence does not support the use of this intervention; however these conclusions are based on a small number of underpowered studies. Therefore, questions remain about the effectiveness of the Kinesio Taping method as an additional treatment to interventions, such as conventional physiotherapy, that have already been recommended by the current clinical practice guidelines in robust and high-quality randomised controlled trials. We aim to determine the effectiveness of the addition of the use of Kinesio Taping in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain who receive guideline-endorsed conventional physiotherapy. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 13% |
Brazil | 2 | 13% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 6% |
Germany | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 286 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 49 | 17% |
Student > Master | 48 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 6% |
Researcher | 17 | 6% |
Other | 44 | 15% |
Unknown | 85 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 13% |
Sports and Recreations | 23 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
Other | 22 | 8% |
Unknown | 97 | 33% |