↓ Skip to main content

Sensory and motor secondary symptoms as indicators of brain vulnerability

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sensory and motor secondary symptoms as indicators of brain vulnerability
Published in
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1866-1955-5-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nava Levit-Binnun, Michael Davidovitch, Yulia Golland

Abstract

In addition to the primary symptoms that distinguish one disorder from the next, clinicians have identified, yet largely overlooked, another set of symptoms that appear across many disorders, termed secondary symptoms. In the emerging era of systems neuroscience, which highlights that many disorders share common deficits in global network features, the nonspecific nature of secondary symptoms should attract attention. Herein we provide a scholarly review of the literature on a subset of secondary symptoms--sensory and motor. We demonstrate that their pattern of appearance--across a wide range of psychopathologies, much before the full-blown disorder appears, and in healthy individuals who display a variety of negative symptoms--resembles the pattern of appearance of network abnormalities. We propose that sensory and motor secondary symptoms can be important indicators of underlying network aberrations and thus of vulnerable brain states putting individuals at risk for psychopathology following extreme circumstances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 172 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 19%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Researcher 12 7%
Other 39 22%
Unknown 34 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 15%
Neuroscience 20 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 41 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,682,159
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#215
of 476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,908
of 203,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.