↓ Skip to main content

Amelioration of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by clozapine is not associated with defective CD4 T cell responses

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amelioration of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by clozapine is not associated with defective CD4 T cell responses
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12974-017-0842-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pirooz Zareie, Bronwen Connor, Anne Camille La Flamme

Abstract

Atypical antipsychotic agents, such as clozapine, are used for treating psychosis and depression and have recently been found to modulate neuroinflammation. We have shown previously that treatment of mice with the atypical antipsychotic agents, clozapine or risperidone, attenuates disease severity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE); however, the mechanism by which they are protective is unknown. In this study, we investigated the effects of clozapine on CD4(+) T cell responses and found that clozapine did not significantly affect the expansion of myelin-specific T cells, their differentiation into pathogenic subsets, or their encephalitogenic capacity to induce EAE. Interestingly, although clozapine enhanced differentiation of regulatory T (Treg) cells, in vivo neutralization of Tregs indicated that Tregs were not responsible for the protective effects of clozapine during the induction and effector phase of EAE. Taken together, our studies indicate that clozapine does not mediate its protective effects by directly altering CD4 T cells.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 8 29%