↓ Skip to main content

Construction of a reference genetic linkage map for carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Construction of a reference genetic linkage map for carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.)
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-734
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masafumi Yagi, Toshiya Yamamoto, Sachiko Isobe, Hideki Hirakawa, Satoshi Tabata, Koji Tanase, Hiroyasu Yamaguchi, Takashi Onozaki

Abstract

Genetic linkage maps are important tools for many genetic applications including mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs), identifying DNA markers for fingerprinting, and map-based gene cloning. Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) is an important ornamental flower worldwide. We previously reported a random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-based genetic linkage map derived from Dianthus capitatus ssp. andrezejowskianus and a simple sequence repeat (SSR)-based genetic linkage map constructed using data from intraspecific F2 populations; however, the number of markers was insufficient, and so the number of linkage groups (LGs) did not coincide with the number of chromosomes (x = 15). Therefore, we aimed to produce a high-density genetic map to improve its usefulness for breeding purposes and genetic research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 6%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2013.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#9,840
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,889
of 224,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#182
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.