↓ Skip to main content

Special considerations in the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder and medical co-morbidities

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of General Psychiatry, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Special considerations in the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder and medical co-morbidities
Published in
Annals of General Psychiatry, April 2004
DOI 10.1186/1475-2832-3-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly D McLaren, Lauren B Marangell

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder has dramatically improved with multiple classes of agents being used as mood-stabilizers, including lithium, anticonvulsants, and atypical antipsychotics. However, the use of these medications is not without risk, particularly when a patient with bipolar disorder also has comorbid medical illness. As the physician who likely has the most contact with patients with bipolar disorder, psychiatrists must have a high index of suspicion for medical illness, as well as a basic knowledge of the risks associated with the use of medications in this patient population. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted and papers addressing this topic were selected by the authors. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Common medical comorbidities and treatment-emergent illnesses, including obesity, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, cardiac disease, hepatic disease, renal disease, pulmonary disease and cancer are reviewed with respect to concomitant use of mood stabilizers. Guidance to clinicians regarding effective monitoring and treatment is offered. CONCLUSIONS: Mood-stabilizing medications are necessary in treating patients with bipolar disorder and often must be used in the face of medical illness. Their safe use is possible, but requires increased vigilance in monitoring for treatment-emergent illnesses and effects on comorbid medical illness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 77 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 16%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 48%
Psychology 7 9%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2014.
All research outputs
#17,233,865
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Annals of General Psychiatry
#326
of 561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,165
of 62,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of General Psychiatry
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.