↓ Skip to main content

X ray screening at entry and systematic screening for the control of tuberculosis in a highly endemic prison

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
X ray screening at entry and systematic screening for the control of tuberculosis in a highly endemic prison
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-983
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Sanchez, Veronique Massari, Germano Gerhardt, Ana Beatriz Espinola, Mahinda Siriwardana, Luiz Antonio B Camacho, Bernard Larouzé

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major issue in prisons of low and middle income countries where TB incidence rates are much higher in prison populations as compared with the general population. In the Rio de Janeiro (RJ) State prison system, the TB control program is limited to passive case-finding and supervised short duration treatment. The aim of this study was to measure the impact of X-ray screening at entry associated with systematic screening on the prevalence and incidence of active TB.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Cambodia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 95 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 21%
Researcher 17 17%
Other 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 41%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,529,942
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,304
of 18,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,614
of 226,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#93
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.