You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differences in the experience of fatigue in patients and healthy controls: patients' descriptions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-5-36 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marieke F Gielissen, Hans Knoop, Petra Servaes, Joke S Kalkman, Marcus J Huibers, Stans Verhagen, Gijs Bleijenberg |
| Abstract |
The primary objective was to develop an adjective checklist, the Fatigue Quality List (FQL), aimed at assessing different perceptions of fatigue. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 26% |
| Psychology | 8 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,764,029
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,219
of 2,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,719
of 68,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.