↓ Skip to main content

High-fat feeding rather than obesity drives taxonomical and functional changes in the gut microbiota in mice

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
55 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-fat feeding rather than obesity drives taxonomical and functional changes in the gut microbiota in mice
Published in
Microbiome, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40168-017-0258-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liang Xiao, Si Brask Sonne, Qiang Feng, Ning Chen, Zhongkui Xia, Xiaoping Li, Zhiwei Fang, Dongya Zhang, Even Fjære, Lisa Kolden Midtbø, Muriel Derrien, Floor Hugenholtz, Longqing Tang, Junhua Li, Jianfeng Zhang, Chuan Liu, Qin Hao, Ulla Birgitte Vogel, Alicja Mortensen, Michiel Kleerebezem, Tine Rask Licht, Huanming Yang, Jian Wang, Yingrui Li, Manimozhiyan Arumugam, Jun Wang, Lise Madsen, Karsten Kristiansen

Abstract

It is well known that the microbiota of high-fat (HF) diet-induced obese mice differs from that of lean mice, but to what extent, this difference reflects the obese state or the diet is unclear. To dissociate changes in the gut microbiota associated with high HF feeding from those associated with obesity, we took advantage of the different susceptibility of C57BL/6JBomTac (BL6) and 129S6/SvEvTac (Sv129) mice to diet-induced obesity and of their different responses to inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) activity, where inhibition of COX activity in BL6 mice prevents HF diet-induced obesity, but in Sv129 mice accentuates obesity. Using HiSeq-based whole genome sequencing, we identified taxonomic and functional differences in the gut microbiota of the two mouse strains fed regular low-fat or HF diets with or without supplementation with the COX-inhibitor, indomethacin. HF feeding rather than obesity development led to distinct changes in the gut microbiota. We observed a robust increase in alpha diversity, gene count, abundance of genera known to be butyrate producers, and abundance of genes involved in butyrate production in Sv129 mice compared to BL6 mice fed either a LF or a HF diet. Conversely, the abundance of genes involved in propionate metabolism, associated with increased energy harvest, was higher in BL6 mice than Sv129 mice. The changes in the composition of the gut microbiota were predominantly driven by high-fat feeding rather than reflecting the obese state of the mice. Differences in the abundance of butyrate and propionate producing bacteria in the gut may at least in part contribute to the observed differences in obesity propensity in Sv129 and BL6 mice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 180 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Student > Master 30 17%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 42 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 51 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#934,784
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#257
of 1,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,921
of 325,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.