↓ Skip to main content

Long term control of a maxillary sinus mucoepidermoid carcinoma with low dose radiation therapy: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long term control of a maxillary sinus mucoepidermoid carcinoma with low dose radiation therapy: a case report
Published in
Radiation Oncology, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-8-251
Pubmed ID
Authors

Horia Vulpe, Meredith Giuliani, David Goldstein, Bayardo Perez-Ordonez, Laura A Dawson, Andrew Hope

Abstract

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the maxillary sinus is a rare malignancy of the head and neck. The location of this tumour near vital structures and its large size at presentation makes surgical resection with negative margins challenging. In incurable cases, relief from symptoms such as epistaxis may be achieved with radiation therapy. We present a case of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the maxillary sinus that was effectively palliated with a short course of radiation therapy, achieving complete cessation of bleeding, decrease in tumour size, and long term control. We surveyed the literature on mucoepidermoid carcinomas and propose that some tumours may be particularly radiosensitive, benefiting from even short courses of radiation therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 19%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Other 6 29%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,396,976
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#302
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,176
of 212,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#11
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.