↓ Skip to main content

COMBIT: protocol of a randomised comparison trial of COMbined modified constraint induced movement therapy and bimanual intensive training with distributed model of standard upper limb rehabilitation…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
375 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
COMBIT: protocol of a randomised comparison trial of COMbined modified constraint induced movement therapy and bimanual intensive training with distributed model of standard upper limb rehabilitation in children with congenital hemiplegia
Published in
BMC Neurology, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2377-13-68
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roslyn N Boyd, Jenny Ziviani, Leanne Sakzewski, Laura Miller, Joanne Bowden, Ross Cunnington, Robert Ware, Andrea Guzzetta, Richard AL Macdonell, Graeme D Jackson, David F Abbott, Stephen Rose

Abstract

Children with congenital hemiplegia often present with limitations in using their impaired upper limb which impacts on independence in activities of daily living, societal participation and quality of life. Traditional therapy has adopted a bimanual training approach (BIM) and more recently, modified constraint induced movement therapy (mCIMT) has emerged as a promising unimanual approach. Evidence of enhanced neuroplasticity following mCIMT suggests that the sequential application of mCIMT followed by bimanual training may optimise outcomes (Hybrid CIMT). It remains unclear whether more intensely delivered group based interventions (hCIMT) are superior to distributed models of individualised therapy. This study aims to determine the optimal density of upper limb training for children with congenital hemiplegia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 371 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 17%
Student > Bachelor 50 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 11%
Researcher 30 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 64 17%
Unknown 104 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 79 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 67 18%
Neuroscience 24 6%
Sports and Recreations 23 6%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 120 32%