↓ Skip to main content

Advancing engagement methods for trials: the CORE study relational model of engagement for a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of experience-based co-design for people living with…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advancing engagement methods for trials: the CORE study relational model of engagement for a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of experience-based co-design for people living with severe mental illnesses
Published in
Trials, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-1878-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauralie Richard, Donella Piper, Wayne Weavell, Rosemary Callander, Rick Iedema, John Furler, David Pierce, Kali Godbee, Jane Gunn, Victoria J. Palmer

Abstract

Engagement is essential in trials research but is rarely embedded across all stages of the research continuum. The development, use, effectiveness and value of engagement in trials research is poorly researched and understood, and models of engagement are rarely informed by theory. This article describes an innovative methodological approach for the development and application of a relational model of engagement in a stepped wedge designed cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), the CORE study. The purpose of the model is to embed engagement across the continuum of the trial which will test if an experience-based co-design intervention improves psychosocial recovery for people affected by severe mental illness. The model was developed in three stages and used a structured iterative approach. A context mapping assessment of trial sites was followed by a literature review on recruitment and retention of hard-to-reach groups in complex interventions and RCTs. Relevant theoretical and philosophical underpinnings were identified by an additional review of literature to inform model development and enactment of engagement activities. Policy, organisational and service user data combined with evidence from the literature on barriers to recruitment provided contextual information. Four perspectives support the theoretical framework of the relational model of engagement and this is organised around two facets: the relational and continuous. The relational facet is underpinned by relational ethical theories and participatory action research principles. The continuous facet is supported by systems thinking and translation theories. These combine to enact an ethics of engagement and evoke knowledge mobilisation to reach the higher order goals of the model. Engagement models are invaluable for trials research, but there are opportunities to advance their theoretical development and application, particularly within stepped wedge designed studies where there may be a significant waiting period between enrolment in a study and receipt of an intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 124 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 35 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Psychology 15 12%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Design 4 3%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 41 33%