You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutrient estimation from an FFQ developed for a black Zimbabwean population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-4-37 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anwar T Merchant, Mahshid Dehghan, Jephat Chifamba, Getrude Terera, Salim Yusuf |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,762,170
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#677
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,293
of 152,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.