↓ Skip to main content

Hypertension management in rural primary care facilities in Zambia: a mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypertension management in rural primary care facilities in Zambia: a mixed methods study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12913-017-2063-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lily D. Yan, Cindy Chirwa, Benjamin H. Chi, Samuel Bosomprah, Ntazana Sindano, Moses Mwanza, Dennis Musatwe, Mary Mulenga, Roma Chilengi

Abstract

Improved primary health care is needed in developing countries to effectively manage the growing burden of hypertension. Our objective was to evaluate hypertension management in Zambian rural primary care clinics using process and outcome indicators to assess the screening, monitoring, treatment and control of high blood pressure. Better Health Outcomes through Mentoring and Assessment (BHOMA) is a 5-year, randomized stepped-wedge trial of improved clinical service delivery underway in 46 rural Zambian clinics. Clinical data were collected as part of routine patient care from an electronic medical record system, and reviewed for site performance over time according to hypertension related indicators: screening (blood pressure measurement), management (recorded diagnosis, physical exam or urinalysis), treatment (on medication), and control. Quantitative data was used to develop guides for qualitative in-depth interviews, conducted with health care providers at a proportional sample of half (20) of clinics. Qualitative data was iteratively analyzed for thematic content. From January 2011 to December 2014, 318,380 visits to 46 primary care clinics by adults aged ≥ 25 years with blood pressure measurements were included. Blood pressure measurement at vital sign screening was initially high at 89.1% overall (range: 70.1-100%), but decreased to 62.1% (range: 0-100%) by 48 months after intervention start. The majority of hypertensive patients made only one visit to the clinics (57.8%). Out of 9022 patients with at least two visits with an elevated blood pressure, only 49.3% had a chart recorded hypertension diagnosis. Process indicators for monitoring hypertension were <10% and did not improve with time. In in-depth interviews, antihypertensive medication shortages were common, with 15/20 clinics reporting hydrochlorothiazide-amiloride stockouts. Principal challenges in hypertension management included 1) equipment and personnel shortages, 2) provider belief that multiple visits were needed before official management, 3) medication stock-outs, leading to improper prescriptions and 4) poor patient visit attendance. Our findings suggest that numerous barriers stand in the way of hypertension diagnosis and management in Zambian primary health facilities. Future work should focus on performance indicator development and validation in low resource contexts, to facilitate regular and systematic data review to improve patient outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT01942278 . Date of Registration: September 2013.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 55 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 15%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Engineering 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 59 34%