↓ Skip to main content

Highlighting mass spectrometric fragmentation differences and similarities between hydroxycinnamoyl-quinic acids and hydroxycinnamoyl-isocitric acids

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Chemistry, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Highlighting mass spectrometric fragmentation differences and similarities between hydroxycinnamoyl-quinic acids and hydroxycinnamoyl-isocitric acids
Published in
BMC Chemistry, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13065-017-0262-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keabetswe Masike, Msizi I. Mhlongo, Shonisani P. Mudau, Ofentse Nobela, Efficient N. Ncube, Fidele Tugizimana, Mosotho J. George, Ntakadzeni E. Madala

Abstract

Plants contain a myriad of metabolites which exhibit diverse biological activities. However, in-depth analyses of these natural products with current analytical platforms remains an undisputed challenge due to the multidimensional chemo-diversity of these molecules, amplified by both isomerization and conjugation. In this study, we looked at molecules such as hydroxyl-cinnamic acids (HCAs), which are known to exist as positional and geometrical isomers conjugated to different organic acids namely quinic- and isocitric acid. The study aimed at providing a more defined distinction between HCA conjugates from Amaranthus viridis and Moringa oleifera, using mass spectrometry (MS) approaches. Here, we used a UHPLC-MS/MS targeted approach to analyze isobaric HCA conjugates extracted from the aforementioned plants. Mass spectrometry results showed similar precursor ions and fragmentation pattern; however, distinct differences were seen with ions at m/z 155 and m/z 111 which are associated with isocitric acid conjugates. Our results highlight subtle differences between these two classes of compounds based on the MS fingerprints, enabling confidence differentiation of the compounds. Thus, these findings provide a template reference for accurate and confident annotation of such compounds in other plants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 28 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 19 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 39 40%