You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The hospital of tomorrow in 10 points
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-017-1664-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Louis Vincent, Jacques Creteur |
| Abstract |
Technology has advanced rapidly in recent years and is continuing to do so, with associated changes in multiple areas, including hospital structure and function. Here we describe in 10 points our vision of some of the ways in which we see our hospitals, particularly those in developed countries, evolving in the future, including increased specialization, greater use of telemedicine and robots, the changing place of the intensive care unit, improved pre-hospital and post-hospital management, and improved end-of-life care. New technology is going to increasingly impact how we practice medicine. We must learn how best to adapt to and encompass these changes if we are to achieve maximum benefit from them for ourselves and our patients. Importantly, while the future hospital will be more advanced technologically, it will also be more advanced on a personal, humane patient care level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 12% |
| Spain | 13 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 9% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Italy | 4 | 4% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 23% |
| Scientists | 10 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 27% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 17% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2018.
All research outputs
#511,218
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#309
of 6,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,601
of 325,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#5
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.