↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate specific antigen

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Urology, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 825)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate specific antigen
Published in
BMC Urology, September 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2490-9-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip Harvey, Amman Basuita, Deborah Endersby, Ben Curtis, Aphrodite Iacovidou, Mary Walker

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the fourth commonest cancer in the UK, and the incidence is rising. The reference standard for diagnosing this condition is prostate biopsy, an invasive procedure. This study systematically reviews recent literature on tPSA accuracy. The time period was restricted to ensure that the estimates referred to contemporary tPSA tests and prostate cancer reference standards. The focus of this review was restricted to European populations as tPSA levels are known to vary by population group.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 18%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Psychology 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 28 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,098,331
of 25,315,460 outputs
Outputs from BMC Urology
#18
of 825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,881
of 99,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Urology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,315,460 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them