↓ Skip to main content

Telephone-based health coaching for chronically ill patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
425 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Telephone-based health coaching for chronically ill patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Dwinger, Jörg Dirmaier, Lutz Herbarth, Hans-Helmut König, Matthias Eckardt, Levente Kriston, Isaac Bermejo, Martin Härter

Abstract

The rising prevalence of chronic conditions constitutes a major burden for patients and healthcare systems and is predicted to increase in the upcoming decades. Improving the self-management skills of patients is a strategy to steer against this burden. This could lead to better outcomes and lower healthcare costs. Health coaching is one method for enhancing the self-management of patients and can be delivered by phone. The effects of telephone-based health coaching are promising, but still inconclusive. Economic evaluations and studies examining the transferability of effects to different healthcare systems are still rare. Aim of this study is to evaluate telephone-based health coaching for chronically ill patients in Germany.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 411 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 15%
Researcher 52 12%
Student > Bachelor 47 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 6%
Other 67 16%
Unknown 92 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 14%
Psychology 49 12%
Social Sciences 26 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 2%
Other 55 13%
Unknown 115 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2013.
All research outputs
#14,359,451
of 21,352,585 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#3,734
of 5,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,389
of 210,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#66
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,352,585 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.