The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Telephone-based health coaching for chronically ill patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-14-337 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Dwinger, Jörg Dirmaier, Lutz Herbarth, Hans-Helmut König, Matthias Eckardt, Levente Kriston, Isaac Bermejo, Martin Härter |
| Abstract |
The rising prevalence of chronic conditions constitutes a major burden for patients and healthcare systems and is predicted to increase in the upcoming decades. Improving the self-management skills of patients is a strategy to steer against this burden. This could lead to better outcomes and lower healthcare costs. Health coaching is one method for enhancing the self-management of patients and can be delivered by phone. The effects of telephone-based health coaching are promising, but still inconclusive. Economic evaluations and studies examining the transferability of effects to different healthcare systems are still rare. Aim of this study is to evaluate telephone-based health coaching for chronically ill patients in Germany. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 487 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 474 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 79 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 14% |
| Researcher | 53 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 74 | 15% |
| Unknown | 134 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 118 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 70 | 14% |
| Psychology | 48 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 61 | 13% |
| Unknown | 154 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,729,864
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#24
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,936
of 292,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#51
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.