↓ Skip to main content

Vision and hearing impairments, cognitive impairment and mortality among long-term care recipients: a population-based cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vision and hearing impairments, cognitive impairment and mortality among long-term care recipients: a population-based cohort study
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12877-016-0286-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuko Mitoku, Naoko Masaki, Yukiko Ogata, Kazushi Okamoto

Abstract

Vision and hearing impairments among elders are common, and cognitive impairment is a concern. This study assessed the association of vision and hearing impairments with cognitive impairment and mortality among long-term care recipients. Data of 1754 adults aged 65 or older were included in analysis from the Gujo City Long-Term Care Insurance Database in Japan for a mean follow-up period of 4.7 years. Trained and certified investigators assessed sensory impairments and cognitive impairment using a national assessment tool. Five-level scales were used to measure vision and hearing impairments. Cognitive performance was assessed on two dimensions, namely communication/cognition and problem behaviors. We performed logistic regression analysis to estimate odd ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of vision and hearing impairments with cognitive impairment. Using Cox proportional hazard regression models, we obtained hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality. Of 1754 elders, 773 (44.0 %) had normal sensory function, 252 (14.4 %) vision impairment, 409 (23.3 %) hearing impairment, and 320 (18.2 %) dual sensory impairment. After adjusting for potential cofounders, ORs of cognitive impairment were 1.46 (95 % CI 1.07-1.98) in individuals with vision impairment, 1.47 (95 % CI 1.13-1.92) in those with hearing impairment, and 1.97 (95 % CI 1.46-2.65) in those with dual sensory impairment compared to individuals with normal sensory function. The adjusted HR of overall mortality was 1.29 (95 % CI 1.01-1.65) in individuals with dual sensory impairment and cognitive impairment relative to normal sensory and cognitive functions. Cognitive impairment was most common in individuals with dual sensory impairment, and those with dual sensory impairment and cognitive impairment had increased mortality.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 7 7%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 30 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Psychology 12 11%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 36 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,413,129
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,882
of 3,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,309
of 338,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#43
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.