You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The future of critical care: renal support in 2027
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-017-1665-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William R. Clark, Mauro Neri, Francesco Garzotto, Zaccaria Ricci, Stuart L. Goldstein, Xiaoqiang Ding, Jiarui Xu, Claudio Ronco |
| Abstract |
Since its inception four decades ago, both the clinical and technologic aspects of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) have evolved substantially. Devices now specifically designed for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury are widely available and the clinical challenges associated with treating this complex patient population continue to be addressed. However, several important questions remain unanswered, leaving doubts in the minds of many clinicians about therapy prescription/delivery and patient management. Specifically, questions surrounding therapy dosing, timing of initiation and termination, fluid management, anticoagulation, drug dosing, and data analytics may lead to inconsistent delivery of CRRT and even reluctance to prescribe it. In this review, we discuss current limitations of CRRT and potential solutions over the next decade from both a patient management and a technology perspective. We also address the issue of sustainability for CRRT and related therapies beyond 2027 and raise several points for consideration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 9 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 13% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Qatar | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 22 | 23% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,608,701
of 25,547,904 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,415
of 6,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,792
of 325,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#28
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,904 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.