↓ Skip to main content

Quality of death notification forms in North West Bank/Palestine: a descriptive study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality of death notification forms in North West Bank/Palestine: a descriptive study
Published in
BMC Research Notes, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13104-017-2469-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jamal A. S. Qaddumi, Zaher Nazzal, Allam R. S. Yacoup, Mahmoud Mansour

Abstract

The death notification forms (DNFs) are important documents. Thus, inability to fill it properly by physicians will affect the national mortality report and, consequently, the evidence-based decision making. The errors in filling DNFs are common all over the world and are different in types and causes. We aimed to evaluate the quality of DNFs in terms of completeness and types of errors in the cause of death section. A descriptive study was conducted to review 2707 DNFs in North West Bank/Palestine during the year 2012 using data abstraction sheets. SPSS 17.0 was used to show the frequency of major and minor errors committed in filling the DNFs. Surprisingly, only 1% of the examined DNFs had their cause of death section filled completely correct. The immediate cause of death was correctly identified in 5.9% of all DNFs and the underlying cause of death was correctly reported in 55.4% of them. The sequence was incorrect in 41.5% of the DNFs. The most frequently documented minor error was "Not writing Time intervals" error (97.0%). Almost all DNFs contained at least one minor or major error. This high percentage of errors may affect the mortality and morbidity statistics, public health research and the process of providing evidence for health policy. Training workshops on DNF completion for newly recruited employees and at the beginning of the residency program are recommended on a regular basis. As well, we recommend reviewing the national DNFs to simplify it and make it consistent with updated evidence-based guidelines and recommendation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 34%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 40%