↓ Skip to main content

Next-generation sequencing and FISH studies reveal the appearance of gene mutations and chromosomal abnormalities in hematopoietic progenitors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hematology & Oncology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Next-generation sequencing and FISH studies reveal the appearance of gene mutations and chromosomal abnormalities in hematopoietic progenitors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13045-017-0450-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel Quijada-Álamo, María Hernández-Sánchez, Cristina Robledo, Jesús-María Hernández-Sánchez, Rocío Benito, Adrián Montaño, Ana E. Rodríguez-Vicente, Dalia Quwaider, Ana-África Martín, María García-Álvarez, María Jesús Vidal-Manceñido, Gonzalo Ferrer-Garrido, María-Pilar Delgado-Beltrán, Josefina Galende, Juan-Nicolás Rodríguez, Guillermo Martín-Núñez, José-María Alonso, Alfonso García de Coca, José A. Queizán, Magdalena Sierra, Carlos Aguilar, Alexander Kohlmann, José-Ángel Hernández, Marcos González, Jesús-María Hernández-Rivas

Abstract

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a highly genetically heterogeneous disease. Although CLL has been traditionally considered as a mature B cell leukemia, few independent studies have shown that the genetic alterations may appear in CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors. However, the presence of both chromosomal aberrations and gene mutations in CD34+ cells from the same patients has not been explored. Amplicon-based deep next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies were carried out in magnetically activated-cell-sorting separated CD19+ mature B lymphocytes and CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors (n = 56) to study the mutational status of TP53, NOTCH1, SF3B1, FBXW7, MYD88, and XPO1 genes. In addition, ultra-deep NGS was performed in a subset of seven patients to determine the presence of mutations in flow-sorted CD34+CD19- early hematopoietic progenitors. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies were performed in the CD34+ cells from nine patients of the cohort to examine the presence of cytogenetic abnormalities. NGS studies revealed a total of 28 mutations in 24 CLL patients. Interestingly, 15 of them also showed the same mutations in their corresponding whole population of CD34+ progenitors. The majority of NOTCH1 (7/9) and XPO1 (4/4) mutations presented a similar mutational burden in both cell fractions; by contrast, mutations of TP53 (2/2), FBXW7 (2/2), and SF3B1 (3/4) showed lower mutational allele frequencies, or even none, in the CD34+ cells compared with the CD19+ population. Ultra-deep NGS confirmed the presence of FBXW7, MYD88, NOTCH1, and XPO1 mutations in the subpopulation of CD34+CD19- early hematopoietic progenitors (6/7). Furthermore, FISH studies showed the presence of 11q and 13q deletions (2/2 and 3/5, respectively) in CD34+ progenitors but the absence of IGH cytogenetic alterations (0/2) in the CD34+ cells. Combining all the results from NGS and FISH, a model of the appearance and expansion of genetic alterations in CLL was derived, suggesting that most of the genetic events appear on the hematopoietic progenitors, although these mutations could induce the beginning of tumoral cell expansion at different stage of B cell differentiation. Our study showed the presence of both gene mutations and chromosomal abnormalities in early hematopoietic progenitor cells from CLL patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2017.
All research outputs
#13,547,128
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#634
of 1,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,269
of 310,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#20
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.