↓ Skip to main content

Fluid balance and cardiac function in septic shock as predictors of hospital mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fluid balance and cardiac function in septic shock as predictors of hospital mortality
Published in
Critical Care, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc13072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott T Micek, Colleen McEvoy, Matthew McKenzie, Nicholas Hampton, Joshua A Doherty, Marin H Kollef

Abstract

Septic shock is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Unfortunately, the optimal fluid management of septic shock is unknown and currently is empirical.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Unknown 162 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 26 15%
Other 25 15%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Master 15 9%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 37 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,645,362
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,305
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,879
of 224,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#17
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.