You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Fluid balance and cardiac function in septic shock as predictors of hospital mortality
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc13072 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Scott T Micek, Colleen McEvoy, Matthew McKenzie, Nicholas Hampton, Joshua A Doherty, Marin H Kollef |
Abstract |
Septic shock is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Unfortunately, the optimal fluid management of septic shock is unknown and currently is empirical. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Egypt | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 162 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 15% |
Other | 25 | 15% |
Researcher | 21 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
Other | 37 | 22% |
Unknown | 29 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 62% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 6% |
Unknown | 37 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,645,362
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,305
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,879
of 224,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#17
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.