↓ Skip to main content

A 60-year review on the changing epidemiology of measles in capital Beijing, China, 1951-2011

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A 60-year review on the changing epidemiology of measles in capital Beijing, China, 1951-2011
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-986
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Li, Li Lu, Xinghuo Pang, Meiping Sun, Rui Ma, Donglei Liu, Jiang Wu

Abstract

China pledged to join the global effort to eliminate measles by 2012. To improve measles control strategy, the epidemic trend and population immunity of measles were investigated in 1951-2011 in Beijing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 10%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 20 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,397,771
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,736
of 14,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,942
of 211,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#146
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.