↓ Skip to main content

Automated integrative high-throughput phenotyping of plant shoots: a case study of the cold-tolerance of pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automated integrative high-throughput phenotyping of plant shoots: a case study of the cold-tolerance of pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Published in
Plant Methods, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13007-015-0063-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan F Humplík, Dušan Lazár, Tomáš Fürst, Alexandra Husičková, Miroslav Hýbl, Lukáš Spíchal

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 2%
Czechia 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 125 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 24%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 25 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Engineering 5 4%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2016.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#980
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,446
of 281,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.