↓ Skip to main content

Antennal transcriptome profiles of anopheline mosquitoes reveal human host olfactory specialization in Anopheles gambiae

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antennal transcriptome profiles of anopheline mosquitoes reveal human host olfactory specialization in Anopheles gambiae
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-749
Pubmed ID
Authors

David C Rinker, Xiaofan Zhou, Ronald Jason Pitts, The AGC Consortium, Antonis Rokas, Laurence J Zwiebel

Abstract

Two sibling members of the Anopheles gambiae species complex display notable differences in female blood meal preferences. An. gambiae s.s. has a well-documented preference for feeding upon human hosts, whereas An. quadriannulatus feeds on vertebrate/mammalian hosts, with only opportunistic feeding upon humans. Because mosquito host-seeking behaviors are largely driven by the sensory modality of olfaction, we hypothesized that hallmarks of these divergent host seeking phenotypes will be in evidence within the transcriptome profiles of the antennae, the mosquito's principal chemosensory appendage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 127 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 13%
Computer Science 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2013.
All research outputs
#5,720,424
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,196
of 10,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,747
of 216,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#20
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,793 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.