You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Body composition in male elite athletes, comparison of bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-5751-7-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ulla Svantesson, Martina Zander, Sofia Klingberg, Frode Slinde |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to compare body composition results from bioelectrical spectroscopy (BIS) with results from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a population of male elite athletes. Body composition was assessed using DXA (Lunar Prodigy, GE Lunar Corp., Madison, USA) and BIS (Hydra 4200, Xitron Technologies Inc, San Diego, California, USA) at the same occasion. Agreement between methods was assessed using paired t-tests and agreement-plots. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Serbia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 28% |
| Sports and Recreations | 22 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2013.
All research outputs
#20,209,145
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#102
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,312
of 155,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them