↓ Skip to main content

Large enchondroma of the thoracic spine: a rare case report and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large enchondroma of the thoracic spine: a rare case report and review of the literature
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12891-017-1519-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Guo, Ju-zhou Gao, Lian-jin Guo, Zhi-xun Yin, Er-xing He

Abstract

Enchondroma, a subtype of chondroma, originates from the medullary cavity of the bone and produces an expansile growth pattern. Enchondroma located in the spine is rare and a few cases of large thoracic enchondroma have been reported. The authors document a rare case of large enchondroma in the thoracic spine of a 49-year-old woman, and discuss its clinical, radiological and histopathological characteristics. The patient presented with rapidly progressive and severe pain on her upper back. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed an expansile lesion at the posterior elements of T3 that was hypointense on T1-weighted images and mixed iso- to hyperintense on T2-weighted images. Administration of gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) resulted in heterogeneous enhancement. During surgery, a large tumor of 4.2cm × 4.7cm × 2.1cm was resected along with the lamina and spinous process. Histological examination revealed that the tumor consisted of mature hyaline cartilage with typical chondrocytes, indicating that it was an enchondroma. Despite its benign-growing nature, enchondroma should be examined closely for signs of enchondromatosis and enchondrosarcoma. Complete surgical resection is the treatment of choice for immediate relief of symptoms and avoidance of recurrence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 8 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2017.
All research outputs
#19,630,735
of 24,998,746 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,148
of 4,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,113
of 315,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#62
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,998,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.