↓ Skip to main content

The prevalence of intraspinal anomalies in infantile and juvenile patients with “presumed idiopathic” scoliosis: a MRI-based analysis of 504 patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The prevalence of intraspinal anomalies in infantile and juvenile patients with “presumed idiopathic” scoliosis: a MRI-based analysis of 504 patients
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12891-016-1026-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen Zhang, Shifu Sha, Leilei Xu, Zhen Liu, Yong Qiu, Zezhang Zhu

Abstract

Though several studies have reported the incidence of intraspinal neural axis abnormalities in infantile and juvenile "presumed idiopathic" scoliosis, there has been a varying prevalence ranging from 11.1 to 26.0 % based on a limited sample size. Therefore, such inconclusive findings have resulted in some questions on the MRI-associated role in the management of these patients. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and distribution of intraspinal anomalies in the infantile and juvenile patients with "presumed idiopathic" scoliosis and to explore the radiographic and clinical indicators with large sample size. A total of 504 infantile and juvenile patients diagnosed with "presumed idiopathic" scoliosis were examined for potentially-existing neural axis abnormalities by MRI. Patients were grouped into two cohorts according to the presence of neural axis abnormalities. Radiographic parameters including curve magnitude, curve pattern, location of apex, degree of thoracic kyphosis, and span of curve were recorded and compared between the two groups. The prevalence of the neural abnormalities between the infantile-age group and juvenile-age group was also compared. The student t test was used to evaluate the differences of continuous variables and the chi-square test was used to evaluate the difference of categorical variables. Fisher exact test was applied to detect the difference of the rate of intraspinal anomalies between the "infantile idiopathic scoliosis" and "juvenile idiopathic scoliosis" group. Involving the spinal cord, 94 patients (18.7 %) were found to have a neural abnormality: Arnold-Chiari malformation alone in 43 patients, Arnold-Chiari malformation combined with syringomyelia in 18 patients, isolated syringomyelia in 13 patients, diastematomyelia in six patients, tethered cord combined with diastematomyelia in six patients, tethered cord alone in four patients, and other uncommon intraspinal abnormalities in the remaining four patients. Totally Arnold-Chiari malformation with or without syringomyelia accounted for 64.8 % (61/94) among all these abnormalities. Male gender, left thoracic curve and right lumbar curve were found to be significantly associated with the presence of neural axis abnormalities on MRI. The incidence of neural axis abnormalities in the presumed IIS and JIS was 18.7 %. Thus a routine MRI evaluation appears warranted for those "presumed idiopathic" scoliosis patients if aged less than 10 years, being male or having left thoracic or right lumbar curve.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,413,129
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,662
of 4,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,699
of 299,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#82
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.