You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Increased pelvic incidence may lead to arthritis and sagittal orientation of the facet joints at the lower lumbar spine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Imaging, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2342-13-34 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thorsten Jentzsch, James Geiger, Samy Bouaicha, Ksenija Slankamenac, Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim, Clément ML Werner |
| Abstract |
Correct sagittal alignment with a balanced pelvis and spine is crucial in the management of spinal disorders. The pelvic incidence (PI) describes the sagittal pelvic alignment and is position-independent. It has barely been investigated on CT scans. Furthermore, no studies have focused on the association between PI and facet joint (FJ) arthritis and orientation. Therefore, our goal was to clarify the remaining issues about PI in regard to (1) physiologic values, (2) age, (3) gender, (4) lumbar lordosis (LL) and (5) FJ arthritis and orientation using CT scans. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 24% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 48% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2021.
All research outputs
#12,693,620
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Imaging
#124
of 589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,464
of 215,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Imaging
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 589 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.