You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Plaque morphology detected with Duplex ultrasound before carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is not a predictor of carotid artery in-stent restenosis, a case control study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Neurology, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2377-13-163 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Katrin Wasser, André Karch, Sonja Gröschel, Janin Witzenhausen, Klaus Gröschel, Mathias Bähr, Jan Liman |
Abstract |
In-stent restenosis (ISR) is an important factor endangering the long-term safety and efficacy of carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS). It is plausible that soft vulnerable plaques are more likely to be injured during CAS procedure and are therefore more likely to initiate the cascade finally leading to ISR. The aim of this study was to investigate if plaque morphology detected by a simple applicable Duplex ultrasound score before CAS can be used as a predictor for ISR. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 50% |
Egypt | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 27% |
Researcher | 5 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 46% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2013.
All research outputs
#14,670,014
of 24,601,689 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#1,199
of 2,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,599
of 221,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#36
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,601,689 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.