You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cost of dengue outbreaks: literature review and country case studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1048 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hans-Christian Stahl, Vicki Marie Butenschoen, Hien Tinh Tran, Ernesto Gozzer, Ronald Skewes, Yodi Mahendradhata, Silvia Runge-Ranzinger, Axel Kroeger, Andrew Farlow |
Abstract |
Dengue disease surveillance and vector surveillance are presumed to detect dengue outbreaks at an early stage and to save--through early response activities--resources, and reduce the social and economic impact of outbreaks on individuals, health systems and economies. The aim of this study is to unveil evidence on the cost of dengue outbreaks. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
Uruguay | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 4 | 1% |
Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 313 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 65 | 20% |
Researcher | 51 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 48 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
Other | 57 | 17% |
Unknown | 52 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
Other | 75 | 23% |
Unknown | 66 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,408,964
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,523
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,670
of 218,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#31
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.