You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The limited utility of electrocardiography variables used to predict arrhythmia in psychotropic drug overdose
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc2345 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas A Buckley, Stephan Chevalier, I Anne Leditschke, Dianne L O'Connell, James Leitch, Susan M Pond |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 35 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 22% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 66% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,282
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,515
of 53,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.