You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors affecting the concordance between orthologous gene trees and species tree in bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-8-300 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Santiago Castillo-Ramírez, Víctor González |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 22% |
| Professor | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 68% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,997
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,155
of 104,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.