↓ Skip to main content

The efficacy and safety of mivacurium in pediatric patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The efficacy and safety of mivacurium in pediatric patients
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12871-017-0350-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruifeng Zeng, Xiulan Liu, Jing Zhang, Ning Yin, Jian Fei, Shan Zhong, Zhiyong Hu, Miaofeng Hu, Mazhong Zhang, Bo Li, Jun Li, Qingquan Lian, Wangning ShangGuan

Abstract

Mivacurium is the shortest acting nondepolarizing muscle relaxant currently available; however, the effect of different dosages and injection times of intravenous mivacurium administration in children of different ages has rarely been reported. This study was aimed to evaluate the muscle relaxant effects and safety of different mivacurium dosages administered over different injection times in pediatric patients. Six hundred forty cases of pediatric patients, aged 2 m-14 years, ASA I or II, were divided into four groups (Groups A, B, C, D) according to the age class (2-12 m, 13-35 m, 3-6 years and 7-14 years) respectively, also each group were divided into four subgroups by induction dose (0.15, 0.2 mg/kg in 2-12 m age class; 0.2, 0.25 mg/kg in other three age classes), and mivacurium injection time (20 s, 40 s), totally 16 subgroups. Neuromuscular transmission was monitored with supramaximal train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. Radial artery blood (1 ml) was sampled to quantify plasma histamine concentrations before and 1, 4, and 7 min after mivacurium injection (P0, P1, P2 and P3). Five hundred sixty-two cases completed the study. There were no demographic differences within the four groups. The onset time of 0.2 mg/kg groups in 2-12 m aged patients were shorter than those of 0.15 mg/kg groups (189 ± 64 s vs. 220 ± 73 s, 181 ± 60 s vs. 213 ± 71 s, P <0.05), and the recovery times were no statistical differences. The T1 25% recovery time of 0.2 mg/kg in 3-6 years aged patients was shorter than that of 0.25 mg/kg group (693 ± 188 s vs. 800 ± 206 s, P <0.05). The onset and recovery times of mivacurium were not different in 13-35 m and 7-14 years aged patients. The plasma concentrations of histamine at P0, P1, P2 and P3 were not different within four groups. The induction dose and injection time of mivacurium had mostly insignificant effects on onset and recovery times. The main exception to this was that in 2-12 m aged patients, increasing the dose of mivacurium from 0.15 to 0.2 mg/kg accelerated the onset time by about 30 s. Mivacurium produced no significant release of histamine in any age group at the doses studied. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier- NCT02117401 , July 14, 2014. (Retrospectively registered).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,413,129
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#1,185
of 1,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,794
of 310,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#28
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,504 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.