Title |
Coordination between primary and secondary care: the role of electronic messages and economic incentives
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12913-017-2096-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Antonella La Rocca, Thomas Hoholm |
Abstract |
In Norway, a government reform has recently been introduced to enhance coordination between primary and secondary care. This paper examines the effects of two newly introduced measures to improve the coordination: an ICT-based communication tool/standard and an economic incentive scheme. This qualitative study is based primarily on 27 open-ended interviews. We interviewed nine employees at a hospital (the focal actor), 17 employees from seven different municipalities, and a representative of a Regional Health Authority. ICT-based communication is perceived to facilitate information exchange between primary and secondary care, thus positively affecting coordination. However, the economic incentive scheme appears to have the opposite effect by creating tensions between the two organizations and accentuating power asymmetry in favor of secondary care. The inter-organizational nature of coordination in health care makes it crucial for policymakers and management of care organizations to conceive incentives and instruments that work jointly across organizations rather than at only one of the health care organizations involved. Such an approach is likely to favor a more symmetrical pattern of collaboration between primary and secondary care. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 272 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 14% |
Student > Master | 36 | 13% |
Researcher | 28 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
Other | 53 | 19% |
Unknown | 71 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 41 | 15% |
Computer Science | 38 | 14% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 35 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 7% |
Other | 38 | 14% |
Unknown | 82 | 30% |