↓ Skip to main content

Environmental mobility barriers and walking for errands among older people who live alone vs. with others

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Environmental mobility barriers and walking for errands among older people who live alone vs. with others
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1054
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li-Tang Tsai, Merja Rantakokko, Erja Portegijs, Anne Viljanen, Milla Saajanaho, Johanna Eronen, Taina Rantanen

Abstract

Walking is the most popular form of physical activity among older people and for community-dwelling older people walking for errands is especially important. The aim of this study is to examine the association between self-reported environmental mobility barriers and amount of walking for errands among older people who live alone compared to those who live with others.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 20%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 18%
Social Sciences 9 12%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,390,246
of 23,861,043 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,742
of 15,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,739
of 219,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#53
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,861,043 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.