You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intersectoral action for health equity: a rapid systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1056 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sume Ndumbe-Eyoh, Hannah Moffatt |
| Abstract |
Action on the social determinants of health is considered a necessary approach to improving health equity. Most of the social determinants of health lie outside the sphere of the health sector and thus collaboration with governmental and non-governmental sectors outside of health are required to develop policies and programs to improve health equity. Case studies of intersectoral action are available, however there is limited information about the impact of intersectoral action on the social determinants of health and health equity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 17% |
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Sudan | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 247 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 51 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 23% |
| Unknown | 43 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 55 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 57 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,572,446
of 25,016,456 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,742
of 16,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,447
of 222,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#34
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,016,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.