↓ Skip to main content

Malaria, a difficult diagnosis in a febrile patient with sub-microscopic parasitaemia and polyclonal lymphocyte activation outside the endemic region, in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Malaria, a difficult diagnosis in a febrile patient with sub-microscopic parasitaemia and polyclonal lymphocyte activation outside the endemic region, in Brazil
Published in
Malaria Journal, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-402
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrícia Brasil, Anielle P Costa, Cecilia L Longo, Sidnei da Silva, Maria F Ferreira-da-Cruz, Cláudio Tadeu Daniel-Ribeiro

Abstract

A case of autochthonous Plasmodium vivax malaria with sub-microscopic parasitaemia and polyclonal B-cell activation (PBA) (as reflected by positive IgM and IgG serology for toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus, and antinuclear and rheumatoid factors) was diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) after consecutive negative rapid diagnostic test results and blood films. The patient, a 44-year-old man from Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil, had visited the Atlantic Forest, a tourist, non-malaria-endemic area where no autochthonous cases of 'bromeliad malaria' has ever been described. The characteristic pattern of fever, associated with PBA, was the clue to malaria diagnosis, despite consecutive negative thick blood smears. The study highlights a need for changes in clinical and laboratory diagnostic approaches, namely the incorporation of PCR as part of the current routine malaria diagnostic methods in non-endemic areas.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 24%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 21%
Psychology 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 12 29%