↓ Skip to main content

The economic impact of chronic fatigue syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 551)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The economic impact of chronic fatigue syndrome
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, June 2004
DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-2-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth J Reynolds, Suzanne D Vernon, Ellen Bouchery, William C Reeves

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a chronic incapacitating illness that affects between 400,000 and 800,000 Americans. Despite the disabling nature of this illness, scant research has addressed the economic impact of CFS either on those affected or on the national economy. METHODS: We used microsimulation methods to analyze data from a surveillance study of CFS in Wichita, Kansas, and derive estimates of productivity losses due to CFS. RESULTS: We estimated a 37% decline in household productivity and a 54% reduction in labor force productivity among people with CFS. The annual total value of lost productivity in the United States was $9.1 billion, which represents about $20,000 per person with CFS or approximately one-half of the household and labor force productivity of the average person with this syndrome. CONCLUSION: Lost productivity due to CFS was substantial both on an individual basis and relative to national estimates for other major illnesses. CFS resulted in a national productivity loss comparable to such losses from diseases of the digestive, immune and nervous systems, and from skin disorders. The extent of the burden indicates that continued research to determine the cause and potential therapies for CFS could provide substantial benefit both for individual patients and for the nation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 7 6%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Psychology 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2021.
All research outputs
#542,307
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#7
of 551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#480
of 59,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them