↓ Skip to main content

A narrative synthesis of the impact of primary health care delivery models for refugees in resettlement countries on access, quality and coordination

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
323 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A narrative synthesis of the impact of primary health care delivery models for refugees in resettlement countries on access, quality and coordination
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-12-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chandni Joshi, Grant Russell, I-Hao Cheng, Margaret Kay, Kevin Pottie, Margaret Alston, Mitchell Smith, Bibiana Chan, Shiva Vasi, Winston Lo, Sayed Shukrullah Wahidi, Mark F Harris

Abstract

Refugees have many complex health care needs which should be addressed by the primary health care services, both on their arrival in resettlement countries and in their transition to long-term care. The aim of this narrative synthesis is to identify the components of primary health care service delivery models for such populations which have been effective in improving access, quality and coordination of care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 313 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 20%
Researcher 32 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Student > Bachelor 24 7%
Other 67 21%
Unknown 80 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 15%
Social Sciences 44 14%
Psychology 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 86 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,645,349
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#895
of 1,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,263
of 215,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.