You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Data extraction from machine-translated versus original language randomized trial reports: a comparative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-2-97 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ethan M Balk, Mei Chung, Minghua L Chen, Lina Kong Win Chang, Thomas A Trikalinos |
| Abstract |
Google Translate offers free Web-based translation, but it is unknown whether its translation accuracy is sufficient to use in systematic reviews to mitigate concerns about language bias. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 31% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 31% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Librarian | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 23% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 24% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,800,984
of 25,307,332 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#965
of 2,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,860
of 223,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.